​I came across an anecdote by the actor Michael Caine recently. Usually I’m reluctant to take any notice of pronouncements by actors because it’s their job to be convincing whilst saying things written by other people. However, Caine was talking about an incident whilst he was working as an actor and, far more importantly, he was Charlie Croker in the Italian Job. 

​He recounted a time during an improvisation where he had to enter a room whilst a couple were arguing. He was about to do his bit when a chair became stuck in the door and stopped him in his tracks. He froze. Something unexpected had occurred and it threw him. The director called a halt and explained that he should ‘use the difficulty’. He expanded, if the scene playing out is a comedy, fall over the chair or if a tragedy, pick it up and hit something with it. Fundamentally use what has happened, however challenging, as an opportunity to learn and progress.

For our purposes in a training environment, the difficulty could be as important missing a season’s goal, simply not hitting a power target in a single training session or something as prosaic as missing a planned ride. In fact anything perceived as missing or falling below set parameters.

Michael Caine's anecdote illustrates a process known as reframing. It’s used in sports psychology to alter performance affecting stress to useful excitement and in clinical settings by psychologists in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to reframe unhelpful thoughts into ones that can be processed more positively. 

It's a process of using events and the information gathered from them dispassionately whilst disentangling the negative emotional element of unhelpful self-criticism. In essence to reframe an effort that has fallen short as a necessary and therefore successful failure. Provided we are prepared to persist, we learn far more from the things we get wrong than the ones we get right, we just have to frame the experience as essential part of progression and and not treat it as a personal disaster or a reflection of self-worth. Matthew Syed in his excellent book about the power of purposeful practice 'Bounce' wrote 'success is built upon the altar of necessary failure'. Simply we must try to do things just beyond our reach, fail, and keep trying. That way, we will ultimately succeed. 
​
The best athletes, with best minds, understand this and apply it to their purposeful practice. See a mistake as a failure, the temptation is to stop trying. Reframe it as an essential part of the learning process and ‘use the difficulty’, and there'll be a better chance of blowing the bloody doors off.  

When I say lying, it’s really error by omission or perhaps not telling the full story. Power meters are a brutal but vital tool to measure intensity and, provided the data is interpreted and implemented correctly, are very effective when used with structured training. One of the pieces of data it produces incidentally to power is an accurate calorie burn. For any length or intensity of ride, it will calculate how much energy has been expended measured in Kcals.

However, for those of us who use the exercise and diet approach to either maintaining or losing weight, there is a catch. It’s called the Energy Compensation Effect (Careau et al, 2021). Fundamentally it means if the power meter says 1200 Kcals have been burned on the Sunday ride, the consumption of 1200Kcals worth of apple pie and custard after lunch would result in a calorie surplus of 350 Kcals.

I know right, it sucks.

The evidence shows as a result of the activity involved whilst training aerobically, there’ll be less background activity after it. Less fiddling around, walking, more sitting and more sitting stiller. This reduces the effective calorie consumption to about 72%, reducing the 1200 Kcal expenditure during the ride to about 850 Kcals in apple pie and custard terms.

​Hands up, this was new to me. I was alighted to it by Steve Keane a strength coach (Steve Kraft Coaching on Instagram) who, if you want some science backed (and funny) insights into strength training is really worth a follow. However, it means my simple ‘if I burn off 3500kcals cycling every week, that’s a pound of fat gone’ is, sadly, wrong. I’d need to burn more like 4800Kcals and maintain my calorie consumption at my basal rate. Bugger.

Explains a lot.
​
So, if (and only if) you want to lose weight whilst training on the bike this is a metric worth knowing. Perhaps more importantly, it reinforces the point that whilst diet and exercise are important, in fat loss terms, it’s the consumption part of the equation that’s likely to carry greater… er, weight.
​
​I’ll write about something happier next time, promise. 

Rich Smith is a psychology graduate and a British Cycling qualified Level 3 Road and TT coach supporting riders nationally and internationally and is coach to the Great Britain Transplant Cycling team. He loves apple pie and custard. He launched RideFast Coaching in 2015 to deliver one to one, rider centred training that is physiologically effective but also psychologically sustainable.